Nazari Urbina vs Zoe Gwen Scandalis Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W L L L L L L L
Form
W L W W W L W L L LH2H: Urbina 1 - 0 Scandalis
They have played 2 sets in total, with Urbina winning 2 and Scandalis winning 0. The last match between Urbina and Scandalis was at the Manzanillo, 22-06-2015, Semifinals, Hard with Nazari Urbina getting the victory 7-6(7) 6-2.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Nazari Urbina | 1 |
| Zoe Gwen Scandalis | 0 |
Manzanillo(22-06-2015)
7
6
6
2
| Urbina | Stats | Scandalis |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| Ret. | Ranking | Ret. |
| 601 | Highest Rank | 868 |
| 35 | Age | 31 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 1 | Titles | 0 |
| 45% (53-65) | Career Total W/L | 51% (90-86) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $2,025 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Kenin VS Sun PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Fonseca VS Paul PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
26 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(7) 6-2 | |||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 13 | Games Won | 8 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 2nd Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Return Points Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Nazari Urbina Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 6-7(3) 6-4 10-5 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 7-5 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 4-6 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats 
Renata Zarazua
Player
Nazari Urbina
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve %
65%
(
37 of
57)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
67%
(
20 of
30)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
14 of
37)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
33%
(
15 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
33 of
57)
63
Total Points Won
39
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Anastasia Pivovarova
Player
Nazari Urbina
57%
(
32 of
56)
1st Serve %
40%
(
21 of
53)
3
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
38%
(
21 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
29 of
53)
64
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 7-5 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
view more
Zoe Gwen Scandalis Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Jeanette Mireles
Player
Zoe Gwen Scandalis
71%
(
5 of
7)
1st Serve %
67%
(
4 of
6)
-
Aces
-
-
Double Faults
-
40%
(
2 of
5)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
50%
(
1 of
2)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
0%
(
0 of
0)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
5
Total Points Won
8
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Pamela Montez
Player
Zoe Gwen Scandalis
63%
(
50 of
80)
1st Serve %
64%
(
53 of
83)
1
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
0
76%
(
38 of
50)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
28 of
53)
37%
(
11 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
39%
(
31 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
41 of
83)
90
Total Points Won
73
|
6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kimmi Hance
Player
Zoe Gwen Scandalis
77%
(
44 of
57)
1st Serve %
72%
(
39 of
54)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
8 of
15)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
33%
(
19 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
23 of
54)
61
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
| SF |
Stats
Ingrid Martins
Player
Zoe Gwen Scandalis
65%
(
31 of
48)
1st Serve %
69%
(
38 of
55)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
84%
(
26 of
31)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
27%
(
13 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
55)
60
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Zoe Gwen Scandalis
Player
Aiko Yoshitomi
69%
(
61 of
88)
1st Serve %
58%
(
42 of
72)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
6
61%
(
37 of
61)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
42%
(
37 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
37 of
72)
88
Total Points Won
72
|
3-6 6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Zoe Gwen Scandalis
Player
Amanda Carolina Nava Elkin
64%
(
37 of
58)
1st Serve %
61%
(
34 of
56)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
7
54%
(
20 of
37)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
5 of
22)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
48%
(
28 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
35 of
56)
65
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Zoe Gwen Scandalis
Player
Maria Gomez
61%
(
19 of
31)
1st Serve %
41%
(
13 of
32)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
7
84%
(
16 of
19)
1st Serve Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
75%
(
9 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
19%
(
6 of
31)
Rtn Points Won
78%
(
25 of
32)
50
Total Points Won
13
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Makenna Jones
Player
Zoe Gwen Scandalis
61%
(
36 of
59)
1st Serve %
65%
(
46 of
71)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
7
53%
(
19 of
36)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
42%
(
25 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
39 of
71)
73
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Zoe Gwen Scandalis
Player
Katya Townsend
71%
(
53 of
75)
1st Serve %
54%
(
39 of
72)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
58%
(
31 of
53)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
43%
(
32 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
37 of
72)
80
Total Points Won
67
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 45% (53/65) | Win/Loss | 51% (90/86) |
| 46% (120/140) | Sets Win/Loss | 52% (205/192) |
| 49% (1110/1166) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (1840/1715) |
| 48% (50/54) | Hard Win/Loss | 51% (73/69) |
| 20% (2/8) | Clay Win/Loss | 52% (17/16) |
| 25% (1/3) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.01 | Aces Per Game | 0.04 |
| 9 | Aces Total | 69 |
| 0.03 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.1 |
| 37 | Total Double Faults | 178 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 468.14 | Average Opponent Rank | 483.21 |
| 60% (437/729) | 1st Serve % | 65% (2373/3635) |
| 52% (226/437) | 1st Serve Win % | 57% (1364/2373) |
| 41% (121/292) | 2nd Serve Win % | 42% (530/1262) |
| 43% (37/86) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 44% (196/444) |
| 43% (306/714) | Return Points Win % | 44% (1595/3602) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/4) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/2) | Main Tour W/L | 33% (2/4) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 33% (13/27) | Challenger W/L | 40% (24/36) |
| 56% (40/32) | Futures W/L | 58% (64/46) |
| 45% (53/118) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 51% (88/174) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 46% (6/13) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 38% (12/32) |
| 42% (10/24) | Deciding Set Win % | 42% (19/45) |
| 82% (57/47) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (93/80) |
| 18% (57/10) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (93/13) |
| 10% (61/6) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 12% (83/10) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
